This article is left here for historical reference. On the whole, amendments to the US/Canada Tax Treaty that came into effect in early 2010 generally make Canadian ULCs undesirable. That said, as of October 2012, we still have some demand for these vehicles, based on current advice. Be sure that you've got good income tax advisers on each side of the US/Canada border if you're going to use a Canadian ULC in your business structure.
Good news for US businesses or US residents looking to do business in Canada!
On March 29, 2007, the BC government passed into law amendments to the Business Corporations Act (BC) that will allow the incorporation of unlimited liability companies (ULCs) in BC. The amendments aren't in effect as of yet; a staffer we spoke to at the BC Corporate Registry said to expect this for the fall of 2007. (It is possible right now to register in BC an out-of-BC created ULC. In Canada, this means either an Alberta ULC or a Nova Scotia ULC.)
Highlights of the new amendments include:
Advantages of ULCs arise primarily for US corporations and individuals who want to carry on business in Canada. The advantages are primarily tax-driven (from a US tax perspective only). In Canada, any ULC will be treated as a regular corporation for corporate taxation and other purposes.
As to the unlimited liability of shareholders, BC has gone for the Nova Scotia approach, which is more favourable than the Alberta approach. Under the Alberta ULC legislation, shareholders are on the hook from day one. In BC and Nova Scotia, shareholders of a ULC are only on the hook once the company decides to stop operations and wind up.
For BCULCs, note that all existing and even former shareholders bear the liability. There are exceptions for former shareholders who transferred their shares one year or more before the date the company goes into liquidation (a formal court process for winding up the company) or dissolution (a less formal process for winding up the company).
"Joint and several" liability means that the existing and qualifying former shareholders as a group must make good on the debts and liabilities and each particular shareholder is also liable. This allows the creditors to go after the shareholder with the deepest pockets. That shareholder would then in turn have a right to claim contribution from the other shareholders. Note that this liability does not depend on the class of shares held by a particular shareholder. However, one wonders whether, as between different classes of shareholders themselves, share rights could specify how the various classes of shareholders contribute to the liability.
In practice, a Canadian ULC is often set up so that the only shareholder is an intermediary US corporation or LLC with limited liability itself, and whose only role is to hold the shares in the ULC. However, where a US individual holds the ULC shares directly, they will want to be careful about the umlimited liability aspect of Canadian ULCs.
The new amendments are good to see. They show a certain level of competition between provinces for business, and a general openness to foreign, particularly US, business in Canada. We'd be pleased to help with any inquiries about forming a ULC whether in BC or another part of Canada.
We Accept
Home | About the Firm | Lawyer Profiles | Blog | Links | Legal | Privacy | Site Map | Contact Us | Meta
© 2005 - 2024, INC Business Lawyers. All rights reserved.